Talk:Hurricane Fausto (2008)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article for GA status and should have the full review up shortly. Dana boomer (talk) 15:55, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   • Meteorological history section, "The origins of Hurricane Fausto were in a westward-moving tropical wave that moved off the eastern coast". Moving/moved...please reword.
   • Meteorological history section, "A deep-layer area of high pressure". I'm not sure what is meant by "deep-layer area".
   • Preparations and impact, "Fausto made its closest approach to the island about 115 mi (185 km) from the island." To the island/from the island...please reword.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   Overall a nice article. Just a few prose tweaks needed, so I'm placing the review on hold. Please let me know if you have any questions or comments. Dana boomer (talk) 16:19, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

   I think I've fixed the three issues, thanks for the review :) Cyclonebiskit 17:53, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

   Everything looks good, so I'm passing the article. Nice work, and thanks for the prompt response. Dana boomer (talk) 18:04, 25 February 2009 (UTC)