Talk:Hurricane Carrie/GA1

Latest comment: 11 years ago by 12george1 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 05:41, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

  • "Hurricane Carrie was the deadliest Atlantic tropical cyclone on record to not make landfall." - Well, since this fact does not appear in the body of the article, there needs to be a citation for it here. Alternatively, you could find a different opening sentence.
  Done - Changed opening to its original state. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "across and a minimum pressure of 945 mbar (hPa; 27.91 inHg)." - You should mention that this was the lowest in relation to Carrie.
  Done - Added in. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Done - The article already states "However, as it curved and accelerated eastward in response to a second trough of low pressure..." which is the same thing explained in the Weather and Circulation publication. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "areas from Block Island south to Savannah, Georgia on September 7" - Are Block Island and Savannah in the same state?
  Done - Added Rhode Island. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "a slight chance of being affected by the storm,[6] but chances decreased after the hurricane curved northwards" - Is there any way you can cut out one of the chance/chances.
  Done - Changed the latter to 'possibilities.' TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • "forecast to potentially impact Bermuda, schools were closed in preparation for Carrie's impact," - Similar issue here, except the key word this time is "impact".
  Done - Removed the latter. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
  • Why no locations for References #1, #2, #17, and #19?
  Done - Added Miami, Florida to all. As for #2 it was a template so I edited the template to display the location. TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the reivew! TheAustinMan(Talk·Works) 15:15, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Good job TheAustinMan. I will now pass this article in accordance to the Good Article standards.--12george1 (talk) 15:29, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply