Talk:Horse breed
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Expand redirect into article edit
See discussion on Template talk:Equidae and Talk:List of horse breeds. --Una Smith (talk) 20:58, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
Suggest reverting contentious material edit
I suggesting reverting the good faith edit by User:montanabw which inserted the following text:
While there is no scientifically accepted definition of the term "breed,"[1] it is a term of art used by those who agree on the rules of heredity or standards of phenotype used qualify animals for inclusion in a given group.[2] Therefore, there will be some subjectivity over what is a true horse breed, an evolving breed, or a horse types.[3]
- ^ The state of the world's animal genetic resources for food and agriculture. Barbara Rischkowsky and Dafydd Pilling. Commission on Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. 2007
- ^ The Genetics of Populations. Jay L Lush. Iowa State University Press. 1994
- ^ Animal Pedigree Act - Secretary’s Manual (see sections on Breed Standards, Distinct Breeds, and Evolving Breeds), Canadian Department of Agriculture, retrieved August 26, 2011
This is a very selective reading of the valid discussion by Rischowsky and Pilling of what constitutes a breed. I think it an excellent an idea to include some of their arguments here, but in a balanced manner, which this is not. For example, they cite Lush as an extreme point of view, but that is not mentioned in the text as it stands; nor is the FAO's own definition, nor the legal aspects within Europe, nor indeed most of what they say. Perhaps it would be better to draft a better version of their arguments here before inserting it in the article? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:48, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
- I put the material in because it was originally placed by WarlanderHorse (a new user) in the List of Horse breeds, where it didn't belong. I reworded it some because it read like a word for word copy from the source. But not having access to the source, It was taking a guess at the intended nuance. I'll revert the edit completely, but if you think the actual content is worth adding, feel free to put in a new version. No kick from me. This article could use some improvement. Montanabw(talk) 23:30, 29 August 2011 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Horse breed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080705105054/http://www.waho.org/Purityissue.html to http://www.waho.org/History.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140201154621/http://www.britishhorseracing.com/goracing/racing/racehorses/history.asp to http://www.britishhorseracing.com/goracing/racing/racehorses/history.asp
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.appaloosa.com/pdfs/rulebook07.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:33, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Horse breed. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080312061526/http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/horses/andalusian/index.htm to http://www.ansi.okstate.edu/breeds/horses/andalusian/index.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080409194007/http://www.arabianhorses.org/registration/reg_rules.asp to http://www.arabianhorses.org/registration/reg_rules.asp
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081012133616/http://www.pintohorseregistry.com/RulesProcedures.html to http://www.pintohorseregistry.com/RulesProcedures.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:20, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello @Shellypls @Montanabw: Why not? It is a group of breeds. Invasive Spices (talk) 17:33, 26 June 2023 (UTC)