Talk:History of the Roman Canon

Catholicism Low‑importance

History of the Roman Canon is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Catholicism task list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : see Draft articles
Assess : see Category:Unassessed Catholicism articles; Category:Unknown-importance Catholicism articles
Cleanup : Blessed Virgin Mary (see the talk page)
Collaborate : Invitation template needed, see Category:WikiProject invitation templates
Copyedit : Cuthbert Tunstall
Expand : Angelus; Roman Catholicism in Kosovo; Bishop Adolph John Paschang; Cum sæpe accidere; Altar Society; American Board of Catholic Missions; Bernard Häring
NPOV : Americanism (heresy); Ensoulment
Photo : see Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of Catholicism
Stubs : see Category:Stub-Class Catholicism articles; Category:Catholic Church stubs
Update : Peer review; John Aloysius Maguire
Verify : Archdiocese of Glasgow; Archbishop of Westminster; Bishop; Saint Mungo; Sanctification; Westminster Cathedral
Other : Watch recent changes for Catholicism articles

Copyright notice

Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The original text is from The Catholic Encyclopedia, which was copyrighted in 1908, and is now in the public domain — MSchmahl 10:35, 30 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

The Nicetas of Romatiana mentioned in this article looks like Nicetas of Remesiana, but the date is wrong. Perhaps someone can help with this identity crisis. Andrew Dalby http://perso.wanadoo.fr/dalby/ 19:22, 14 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

You seem to be right. The Catholic Encyclopedia article begins, "Nicetas of Remesiana (Romanatia)". The dates of death conflict with this article, so I'll just remove it from this article. — MSchmahl… 19:31, 14 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sources?

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Many statements are made throughout the entry without proper sourcing. Not everything comes from the Catholic Encyclopedia article. Whatever does not needs to be sourced, please!Mwidunn (talk) 18:19, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic