Talk:History of the Diablada
 | The contents of the History of the Diablada page were merged into Diablada on 5 September 2021 and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Writing wrong
editThe wording of the article does not go with the title, attempts to show the history of the devil should put aside the controversial origins and only limited to the history of dance including that? and how? and where? seemed the word "devil "and was becoming known in the highlands. For that reason the template is positioned as the article requires several changes. Nair (talk) 15:38, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Making impartial investigations, there is no controversy about the origin and history of the "diablada" dance, it is indeed and undoubtedly a Bolivian dance, what must be clear is that devil dances exist in different regions of the American continent that are not "diablada". There are different dances in relation to the devil in Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, Ecuador, Argentina, Peru, Chile and Bolivia. "Diablada" is a specific dance with choreography and rhythm specifically defined and developed in Oruro Bolivia. Now the diablada of Oruro with its defined characteristics is practiced in Puno Peru, but the specific dance is not of Peruvian origin and this is because Puno was a forgotten place and far from its government capital Lima, and because of its proximity to La Paz Bolivia was strongly influenced but the influence was mostly from Bolivia to Puno Peru. Before the 60's in Puno it was very clear that the dances called "TRAJE DE LUCES" were Bolivian dances. Many Peruvian researchers affirm with concrete evidence that the "diablada" is a dance of Bolivian origin, among them Javier Salas Avila, Americo Valencia Chacon, Roberto Valencia Melgar, among others. In Puno Peru there was probably a devil dance but that was not "diablada" EKP70 (talk) 13:36, 29 December 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on History of the Diablada. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}tag to http://www.correoperu.com.pe/correo/nota.php?txtEdi_id=18&txtSecci_id=72&txtSecci_parent=&txtNota_id=106612 - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091224155130/http://www.micarnaval.net/mitologia.htm to http://www.micarnaval.net/mitologia.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090815145701/http://www.micarnaval.net/origen_diablada.htm to http://www.micarnaval.net/origen_diablada.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090904134937/http://www.la-razon.com/versiones/20090820_006825/nota_253_864270.htm to http://www.la-razon.com/versiones/20090820_006825/nota_253_864270.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:52, 5 November 2017 (UTC)