Talk:History of Münster
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in German. Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
Untitled edit
New Jerusalem *cannot* be described as either "democratic" or "proto-socialist," either in theory or practice. In that period and part of the world, the Ditmarsken "marsh men" region, could possibly be described in that fashion (although I doubt it) -- but never Münster. This was an undiluted, 200 proof theocracy. Augwhite (talk)
Translation edit
In the following weeks/months I will endavour to update this article with a translation of the one from the German Wikipedia. Assistance for this project will be most welcome. My draft will be based on the current Englsih version and can be found under User:Abracus/Muenster draft -- Abracus (talk) 15:44, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
What is missing from the recently created city timeline article? Please add relevant content! Contributions welcome. Thank you. -- M2545 (talk) 16:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on History of Münster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090110235446/http://kirchensite.de/index.php?myELEMENT=78003 to http://www.kirchensite.de/index.php?myELEMENT=78003
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)