Removed Religious text primary template edit

This article had the template {{Religious text primary|date=October 2011}}, which displays "improperly uses one or more religious texts as primary sources without referring to secondary sources that critically analyze them".

I don't think this is appropriate; the article basically says "a religious text says such and such", and does not assert that this is truth. "The book of Mormon says that Himni was a missionary" and so on is indisputably documented by the primary source. I think it's clear enough that "During their sojourn there, Himni was imprisoned and beaten" is obviously according to the book, and not to be taken as a statement of proven fact.

If anybody disagrees I'm quite happy for the template to be reinstated without reference to or discussion with me; I'd suggest the original October 2011 date be reinstated. Pol098 (talk) 15:59, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply