Talk:Hazelwood Park, South Australia

Census Figures

Including Tusmore like that, whilst accurate, definetely detracts from the text and makes the article harder to read - for most of my other articles I just put '[suburb name] census area', and with the link in the footnotes giving the complete census area:

eg. Community Profile: Hazelwood Park/Tusmore courtesy ABS and the City of Burnside

It just makes it easier to understand. I won't press it, but if you're intending to go for FA (which I aim for) I'd suggest it being done so. michael ^talk 09:04, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

I still don't like it but I've changed it for readability. It's just a bit off to claim the suburb has 3000 people when really its population is only half that (approx) ...maelgwntalk 09:43, 11 February 2006 (UTC)

Kaurna

The Kaurna information is largely duplicated from the Kaurna page, and is not specific to Hazelwood Park in any way beyond the fact that Hazelwood Park is part of the Adelaide Plains. There was a discussion about this on the Mount Osmond, South Australia page, where the consensus was to mention the Kaurna history in the area briefly, plus any dreaming stories relevant to the place. I think discussing burnoff techniques and population counts is a bit irrelevant to this article. --Yeti Hunter (talk) 04:15, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hazelwood Park, South Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060404051723/http://www.burnside.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=668 to http://www.burnside.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=668
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090130055825/http://burnside.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=796 to http://www.burnside.sa.gov.au/site/page.cfm?u=796

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 31 October 2017 (UTC)