Talk:Hawker Woodcock

Latest comment: 2 years ago by MilborneOne in topic Specifications

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Hawker Woodcock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:40, 31 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

Specifications edit

Length in article 25' 7" v 26' 2"
Span in artice 34' 8" v 32' 6"
Height in article 9' v 9' 11"
Wing Area in article 356 sq ft 346 sq ft

The figures for the Woodcock II in the article differ from those given in Putnams's "Aircraft of the Royal Air Force since 1918", anybody have the source used to check, thanks. MilborneOne (talk) 20:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Dimensions were for the Mk I - I must have made a transcription error when I first entered them in 2007 - now fixed.Nigel Ish (talk) 20:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for that, I dont have the Hawker book. MilborneOne (talk) 20:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)Reply