Talk:Hawker Hart

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hawker Hart article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / Asian / South Pacific / British / Canadian / European / Indian / North America / South Asia / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	Asian military history task force
	Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force
	British military history task force
	Canadian military history task force
	European military history task force
	Indian military history task force
	North American military history task force
	South Asian military history task force
	World War II task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

WP:MILHIST Assessment edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Includes the majority of what needs to be said on this subject; includes pictures, specs and an infobox, and has more prose than many mil. aviation pages. Nice work. LordAmeth 08:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Could use more citations to be even better. --Colputt 01:18, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Too many photos crammed in and too many on both margins, a deprecated practice. Keith-264 (talk) 08:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

use of Osprey edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

in the description it says: "The Hawker Osprey was the navalised carrier-borne version " - the term "carrier-borne" strikes me as wrong! As far as I can see it was not used on carriers but large surface units EXCEPT carriers like the cruiser Enterprise (see picture). But this is a float-plane! 80.151.9.187 (talk) — Preceding undated comment added 09:31, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

It was operated off carriers with a conventional landing gear, but could also be fitted with floats - like many aircraft operated by the Fleet Air Arm at the time - see File:Service of Squadron Leader Arthur Berkeley in the Royal Air Force, 1925-1934 HU63336.jpg for an example of an Osprey without floats.Nigel Ish (talk) 11:48, 10 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hawker demons range edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I need to knoww 148.252.132.148 (talk) 18:24, 10 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic