Talk:Hawaiian Falls
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hawaiian Falls article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Hawaiian Falls. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Hawaiian Falls at the Reference desk. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Hawaiian Falls be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 January 2020 and 20 April 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Rghx.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 23:08, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Comment
editMany people have different views toward Hawaiian Falls. Some people like the park while others can point out flaws, organizational errors, and hazards. These opinions would help bring a more neutral point of view toward the article as well as unmark it as advertising, however, sources can not be found to back up the opinions and to turn these opinions more into citable facts.
Can anyone please help?
rct247 20:35, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
Copy-Edit Changes Made
editWhile doing a copy-edit on the article, I removed some things that don't seem relevant:
Removed from First Season: Admission on opening day was $12.99 plus tax for adults, $7.99 plus tax for children under 48 inches, and free for children under 3 years of age. Hours for the first season consisted of Monday through Saturday 10:30am to 6:00pm and Sundays were from Noon to 6:00pm.
Removed from Second Season: Prices in 2004 were $14.99 plus tax for adults, $7.99 plus tax for children under 48 inches, 3 and under were free, seniors 60 and older were $7.99 plus tax, and spectators were $7.99 plus a deposit & tax.
Removed from Third Season: Ticket prices remained unchanged from 2004, but operating hours were expanded to consist of Noon to 7pm on Sundays; 10:30am to 6:00pm on Mondays, Wednesdays, & Saturdays; and 10:30am to 7:00pm on Tuesdays and Thursdays.
Removed from Fourth Season: Ticket prices remained the same while operating hours changed again to be Sundays Noon to 7pm; Saturdays 10:30am to 6:00pm; Weekdays 10:30am to 7:00pm.
Removed from Fifth Season: Ticket prices were increased to $16.99 for adults and $9.99 for children. Hours remained the same.
I looked at some larger theme park articles (e.g., Astroworld) and they didn't have this level of detail, and it feels out of place here.
Also, I'd like some though around whether the exhausting listing of rules for every ride is required?
Proposed merge with various individual articles
editI feel the article on the chain could be expanded to include information from the various other articles. It would be similar to what was done with Aquatica (water parks) a little while back. Themeparkgc Talk 06:14, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
- I disagree. Although the parks share the same name, they offer different attractions and experiences. Each one is unique. The parks are not franchise restaurants where everything is exactly the same.FirstDrop87 (talk) 14:04, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
- Support I support the merge as some of the park pages does not gives information other than the Waco location in all which can be displayed on one page. --Jpp858 (talk) 04:22, 7 August 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hawaiian Falls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150106011031/http://impactnews.com/austin-metro/round-rock-pflugerville-hutto/some-full-time-hawaiian-falls-employee/ to http://impactnews.com/austin-metro/round-rock-pflugerville-hutto/some-full-time-hawaiian-falls-employee/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141021111045/http://www.myrockwallnews.com/2014/0411/featured/rockwall-council-votes-against-more-public-private-partnerships-as-proposed-by-hawaiian-falls to http://www.myrockwallnews.com/2014/0411/featured/rockwall-council-votes-against-more-public-private-partnerships-as-proposed-by-hawaiian-falls
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)