Talk:Hatley Park National Historic Site
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
A few changes edit
FYI, I've split the information about the Hatley Park neighbourhood into Hatley Park (Greater Victoria). I've also merged Hatley Gardens into this article, deleted a duplicate copy of this article that was residing at Hatley Park, and done some reorganization and miscellaneous cleanup work. Hope everything is satisfactory. —smably 17:44, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
Scots Baronial? I think not! edit
It's quite possible that a building in the Scots Baronial Style may have been asked for, but looking at the photo tells me that it wasn't provided. This building does not look anything like traditional Scots Baronial: where are the corner turrets? where is the general Scottish feel? This looks more like an imitation of an English Cotswold manor, mixed in with some Tudorbethan half timbering. It's very pretty, but it's not Scots Baronial. Simhedges (talk) 17:38, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Historic site, neighbourhood and castle articles edit
Should the castle get its own article, the way Royal Roads University and the neighbourhood? If not, then this article should have the "buildings and strcutures" cat, no?Skookum1 (talk) 13:49, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
Royal Roads redirect edit
While tweaking something on Monarchy in British Columbia I used Royal Roads, which of course redirects here as it's usually synonymous (nowadays) with Royal Roads University (which if it's merged into this article, maybe shouldn't be), but the "main" reference is to the Royal Roads, the body of water offshore where ships would/could assemble; the marine meaning of "roads" is largely obscured or forgotten today, not just in BC - e.g. Hampton Roads. But I'm wondering given all the otehr water-body articles we have whether or not Royal Roads needs its own article - it's quite historic and therefore notable, actually - and obviously isn't part of Hatley Castle. How to disambig it I'm not sure, if it were to need disambig'ing that is.Skookum1 (talk) 16:57, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Hatley Park National Historic Site. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120423110207/http://myrru.royalroads.ca/roadspiel/fyi/archives-and-band-played to http://myrru.royalroads.ca/roadspiel/fyi/archives-and-band-played
- Added archive https://archive.is/20110814222622/http://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/beefp-fhbro/FHB_RES_E.asp to http://www.pc.gc.ca/apps/beefp-fhbro/FHB_RES_E.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:31, 31 October 2017 (UTC)