Talk:Haryana Forestry case

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 16 March 2018 by reviewer MatthewVanitas (talk · contribs).

Forestry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Creating new as separate article is needed edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This is a currently under investigation by Supreme Court of India. it can not be primarily merged with any of the stakeholders due to several reason. Merging will distort WP:BALANCE of those articles while losing the key details. Besides there are several entities, both investigating agencies and people being investigated, it is not commonsensical to merge with one entity. As the case progresses, it might go to Supreme Court and may spawn off multiple cases and counter-cases, chargesheets, additional investigations by the current or more agencies, and so on.

Politically motivated supporters might try to have it deleted due to WP:COI WP:Systemic bias. Both, political supporters and opponents with WP:NPOV, might try to vandalise this article either by diluting or embellishing the facts.

Future editors: To keep the articles in adherence with WP:BLP, please add only the court related details such as court verdicts, submissions in the court. Refrain from adding content that is usually outside the court or investigating agencies, such as the opinion/noise of supporters and opponents, even if those are reported in the reputed newspapers.

Keep this as a separate article and please add it to your watch list to protect it from the biased editing and vandalism.

Thanks. 202.156.182.84 (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic