Talk:Avatar Course
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Verification, Neutrality, & Weight edit
Since these tags were recently added to the article, an explanation a discussion would be most welcome.
Regarding POV and undue weight, my opinion is that this is a natural result of the only information with sources of any credibility being for facts and reporting not favorable or neutral to the subject. Every effort has been made to find and include positive information and sources (or contrary citations regarding negative reporting), but sadly, there appear to be few if any outside of blatant marketing materials. If the article was weighted to be "balanced" in terms of pros and cons, it would have to be unduly weighted in favor of citations that don't pass standards muster or the elimination of citations that do down to less than a stub. In other words, it is what it is, until and unless there is more credible information to be added.
As for verification, I can find only one sentence tagged. I agree, but that hardly justified the additional tag on the page itself. If there are other issues, again, I would ask they be enumerated clearly.
In absence of clarification and discussion, I will move to remove both the offending sentence and the warning templates. But I'd prefer not to do such unilaterally as it may be perceived as some personal bias.
Ken JP Stuczynski (talk) 22:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Avatar Course. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081219160355/http://theavatarcourse.com/index.php/en/sei/about-harry-palmer.html to http://theavatarcourse.com/index.php/en/sei/about-harry-palmer.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050905045615/http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200313963.pdf to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200313963.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080509090716/http://www.internationalavatarcourse.com/_fileCabinet/LivDelElectronic.pdf to http://www.internationalavatarcourse.com/_fileCabinet/LivDelElectronic.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050905045615/http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200313963.pdf to http://www.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/ops/200313963.pdf
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060105204658/http://www.avatarepc.com/sitrep1.html to http://www.avatarepc.com/sitrep1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:28, 26 December 2017 (UTC)
Avatar Course article edit
Despite the somewhat convincing analysis, the arguments that Avatar should not be considered a cult ([1]) should be reconsidered because of Wikipedia's policy about No Original Research (WP:NOR). Newatlascamels (talk) 17:03, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
Avatar Course - "Cult-like" edit
Whether or not the Avatar Course is a cult isn't really an issue to be settled on its Wikipedia page. However, many of the citations used in this article describe Avatar as being cult-like. To whitewash the controversy is to do a disservice to anyone who comes to Wikipedia for facts. CapnPhantasm (talk) 16:33, 13 November 2023 (UTC)