Talk:Hamama
 | Warning: active arbitration remedies The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:
Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.
|
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please stop changing the history by removing "palestinian" word with no reason, i think you have to read more about Hamama's history and people, why r u that much upset from the truth , even that the i said "WAS" and it's now still under the zionist occupation which you have change it to israel, u have no right to remove palestinian and keep Israel, i'll keep changing it up to death, and I'll tell all my friends to keep watching it and changing ,plz stop doing that, thanks
- It was a town in Israel/Palestine, Ubai - we've been over this. Changing Wikipedia won't change the world, so leave it how it was. HawkerTyphoon 12:16, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
Mistakes
editIt seems as if the description of this is place was missed by Conder and Kitchener. It looks quite large, on SWP map 16, named Hamameh. But it is only mentioned in passing (on p. 418). (Same mistake was done at Kaukab Abu al-Hija.) Cheers Huldra (talk) 23:08, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- Agreed. The index says that it is on page 267 but it isn't mentioned there I think. Zerotalk 23:17, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
- P. 267 is the correct ref. to Palmer (already in the article). Its neighbouring villages were described in Conder & Kitchener around p. 410.
- Also: Petersen, 2001, p. 146 gives SWP II p. 422 as a ref for this place. That is clearly wrong: the "El Hummam" mentioned there, is a tiny structure much further east, on same SWP map 16. Cheers, Huldra (talk) 23:26, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hamama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101129211809/http://hamama1948.com/ to http://www.hamama1948.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Hamama. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101129211809/http://hamama1948.com/ to http://www.hamama1948.com/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:53, 28 October 2017 (UTC)
Hütteroth and Abdulfattah, mistake
editHütteroth and Abdulfattah, 1977, p. 142 has a mistake about this place...they write that total revenue is 6,800, but they only list 500 (occasional revenues) and 300 (goats and bees). So where did the other 6000 Akçe come from? It looks as if they missed some posts, Huldra (talk) 21:03, 4 April 2018 (UTC)