Talk:HD 203473

Merger proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was redirected by 400Weir. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 18:58, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

---

I propose merging HD 203473 b into HD 203473. This is another case where a planet candidate turned out to be a star; as with other such cases there's really no need to have two separate articles. SevenSpheresCelestia (talk) 23:25, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

Independent notability of the exoplanet is a bit sketchy, but as a non-planet it would be non-existent. I didn't see that in a very brief look at the literature. though. Is there some very recent paper that I didn't spot? Lithopsian (talk) 13:03, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Ah, I see, Feng et al (2022). Lithopsian (talk) 13:05, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Wait, it's a star?! Let me check it out! Speed doesn't always mean quality. 400Weir (talk) 18:44, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

Oh, I forgot to ask for a link. Speed doesn't always mean quality. 400Weir (talk) 18:47, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

I'ma do it right now. Speed doesn't always mean quality. 400Weir (talk) 18:52, 7 September 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.