Talk:Gymnostachys

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: New South Wales / Queensland / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Gymnostachys is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Proposed merge of Gymnostachydoideae edit

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

As far as I know this is a straightforward application of the guidelines at WP:TOL ("In cases where a group only contains a single subgroup, the two should not be separated"), but I thought I'd ask here just in case. Kingdon (talk) 00:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yep, it should be moved.Chhe (talk) 05:06, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Yes, agree that Gymnostachydoideae should be merged into the Gymnostachys article. Melburnian (talk) 12:09, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic