The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Latest comment: 20 days ago1 comment1 person in discussion
They explicitly and philosophically reject the former and embrace the latter. Not once, has Nick ever affirmed the former, and the members of his movement, the groypers, come from all backgrounds, including Jews and Ethnic Minorities.
The former is a slander applied for political expediency from their opponents. It does not belong in this article especially given how vocal Nick is about not only rejecting "White Nationalism", but also debating and making fun of people who proclaim that they are. 64.180.207.173 (talk) 03:17, 11 October 2022
"Fuentes has made a name for himself as the leader of a group who call themselves “Groypers.” The group consists of mostly younger, white men and members are known for their embrace of racist slurs and politics, admiration for the Nazis and Holocaust denial."
Nicole Hemmer, a historian at Vanderbilt University who focuses on the far right, told TPM: “The Groypers are essentially the equivalent of neo-Nazis … They’re an extremist group that is OK with violence.” DocZach (talk) 21:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
@FMSky - When you first made the edit to remove that ([1]), I was skeptical and looked through the sources. I was surprised to find that none explicitly call the Groypers "neo-Nazis". I believe you are correct. None of the sources DocZach provided ([2], [3], [4]). They say individuals are neo-Nazis (Fuentes) and that the Groypers are "essentially equivalent to" them, but they don't call the Groypers themselves that label. We cannot make that final connection to say "Groypers are neo-Nazis" without RS being clear on it. EvergreenFir(talk)21:19, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Yes thats my point, we need to be precise about this type of stuff. "Essentially the equivalent of" doesnt cut it --FMSky (talk) 21:20, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
A vast amount of sources describe Nick Fuentes as a neo-Nazi and a neo-Nazi leader, and the entire idea of the "Groyper Army" are followers and ideological fans of Nick Fuentes. DocZach (talk) 21:21, 17 July 2024 (UTC)Reply