Talk:Green Mosque, Balkh

Afghanistan Low‑importance

	Afghanistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Afghanistan, a project to maintain and expand Afghanistan-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AfghanistanWikipedia:WikiProject AfghanistanTemplate:WikiProject AfghanistanAfghanistan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Islam: Mosques Low‑importance

	Islam portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islam, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Islam-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslamWikipedia:WikiProject IslamTemplate:WikiProject IslamIslam-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Mosques task force.

"By the communists" edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This sounds like speculation or original research, plus the wording could be better. Is there any evidence to suggest that Soviet forces were responsible for that specific damage to the mosque? 173.166.110.9 (talk) 17:39, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposal edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I propose merging Khwaja Abu Nasr Parsa shrine into this article. The two buildings are one and the same. Sgnpkd (talk) 18:12, 2 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Sgnpkd: do you have any sources/evidence that indicate that these are the same. The content of the current articles is quite different; for example, different dates of establishment/construction. I agree that they're in the same city! So, oppose merge unless we're sure that they're the same place; otherwise, link with (perhaps distinguish) hatnotes. Klbrain (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Closed, given the abscence of support and uncontested objection, but would be very happy to be proved wrong! Klbrain (talk) 09:05, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic