Talk:GreenPAK

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Rosguill in topic Notability

Notability

edit

[1] is good. [2] and [3] appear to be more churnalistic. Other sources cited are not WP:RELIABLE. My own search turned up a few more middling sources such as [4]. Notability is marginal but this has waited long enough in the AfC queue. I'll accept and we'll see what happens. ~Kvng (talk) 21:04, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

There's some coverage in scholarly sources which make me think this is notable, although I suspect that the initial editor is likely paid. signed, Rosguill talk 22:01, 12 March 2021 (UTC)Reply