Talk:Brazil–Greece relations

(Redirected from Talk:Greco-Brazilian relations)
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Arbitrarily0 in topic Requested move

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 03:50, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply


Greco-Brazilian relationsBrazil–Greece relations – Switch to country names rather than nationality as seen in other bilateral relations articles. Delusion23 (talk) 16:26, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Support for consistency with all other bilateral relations categories. Good Ol’factory (talk) 09:52, 22 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per Delusion23. Takabeg (talk) 05:49, 23 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Support per above. Limongi (talk) 00:23, 24 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • comment Wikipedia is Not a democracy this isn't a vote. do you have any arguments or opinions to lend to that support? The "support" is supposed to mean your statement supports it, not your personal opinion (of another's argument) supports it. Smitty1337 (talk) 13:09, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose there are other examples which contradict that reasoning for example Sino-American relations "Brazilian" doesn't just mean a person from Brazil it also means something of or related to Brazil. Smitty1337 (talk) 13:09, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
We know that Wikipedia is Not a democracy. But according to google books research,

In this situation, we can chose by Wikipedia:Article titles and users' arguments.

On the other hahnd, there are many many samples for Sino-American relations. Takabeg (talk) 14:00, 26 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Comment I'll leave my above statement since it is still a valid point. But after reviewing the other articles at Category:Bilateral_relations_of_Greece there is a clear preference for either Greece or Greek. I'm neutral and won't oppose the move for the sake of consistency. Smitty1337 (talk) 01:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.