Talk:Good moral character

Any other crimes of morality?

I think crimes such as possession of drug paraphrenalia should be added to the list. Having a weed pipe in your pocket on your 18th birthday is certainly a reason why people are permanently kept out of work through background checking agencies. If there is a legal reason why this occurs other than through a judgment of "good/bad moral character", I'd like to hear it. In any case, I would be very happy to see the employment section expanded. MisplacedFate1313 (talk) 20:09, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

Aliens

I see one of the criteria given is being guilty of 'alien smuggling'. Quite right too: anybody caught trying to smuggle those pesky Martians into the US of A is clearly not of good moral character and should be whipped out of town. Enaidmawr (talk) 19:01, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

In the Last 5 Years

There's a reference to offenses committed during "the five years preceding application." That's an outdated standard. There are some old Department of Justice documents still out there talking about that rule as it applies to judicial deportation (see http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01934.htm) but that part of the Immigration and Nationality Act has long since been amended and transferred from 8 USC 1251 to 8 USC 1182. (see http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode08/usc_sec_08_00001182----000-.html) Also, the "What is Good Moral Character" checklist cited as a reference at http://careers.findlaw.com/firmsite/attachments/LE6_c_checklist_WhatIsGoodMoralCharacter.pdf seems to be outdated as well.--Sophosmoros (talk) 16:18, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

I removed the "five years preciding" line. --Sophosmoros (talk) 16:23, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

Gambling

Is "earning one's income from gambling" (with the possible assumption that it is legal gambling) a crime anywhere? I somewhat cannot imagine it to be... and if not, it should not be listed under "crimes" but in a distinct section.--2.236.198.248 (talk) 00:55, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Good moral character. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071127043144/http://careers.findlaw.com/firmsite/attachments/LE6_c_checklist_WhatIsGoodMoralCharacter.pdf to http://careers.findlaw.com/firmsite/attachments/LE6_c_checklist_WhatIsGoodMoralCharacter.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:15, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

List of vices

"working seven days a week," seems like a vice to me under Xian morality. :) Zezen (talk) 20:20, 3 December 2018 (UTC)

Perhaps you should be an administrative law judge, but even good judges are often structurally bound by improperly argued prior cases from superior courts.

The down side to reliability, i.e., the downside to stare decisis is that erroneous law can become ingrained to do harm instead of good. Clearly erroneous case law can emerge amidst an improperly researched and argued case. The superior court adjudicates what is before them, and then the lower courts are bound to follow. Thus, while you might be a wise judge on morality, you could be bound to follow erroneous precedent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.127.184.66 (talk) 05:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)

Having good morals

Speech about having good morals 41.114.102.104 (talk) 11:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)