Talk:Gonococcemia

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dermatology task force.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 25 October 2021 and 20 November 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jlg4947. Peer reviewers: DPrinceDO.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Article categorization edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was initially categorized based on scheme outlined at WP:DERM:CAT. kilbad (talk) 15:22, 4 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review edit

General info edit

Whose work are you reviewing?

Jlg4947

Evaluate the drafted changes

(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: edit

The lead has been updated with the content that the user has added. Could use a line about treatment. lead is clear and concise with a good introductory sentence.

Content: edit

Content is up-to-date and relevant to the topic. I do not thing there is any content that needs to be added or removed.

Tone and Balance: edit

The article is well balanced between its different sections. The tone is neutral and does not appear to try and influence the reader.

Sources and References: edit

The sources are current. All of the new material that has been add appears to be backed up by sources. Sources come from peer reviewed journals and one from the CDC which is a reputable source. All the links in the sources work.

Organization: edit

The added content is clear, easy to read, and well organized.

Images and Media: edit

No images or media has been added to this point but the work is ongoing so they may plan to add some.

Overall Impression: edit

The added content has improved the article significantly. Great statistics in the epidemiology section. A few images might help the article.

DPrinceDO (talk) 21:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Add topic