Talk:Going Through the Motions

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Vegaswikian in topic Requested move
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Going Through the MotionsGoing through the motions — Makes sense to call it by the proper form which appears in the dictionary and is the primary use of the phrase. "Going Through the Motions" can redirect here anyway. Penbat (talk) 16:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

  • Oppose. All 10 entries on this dab page are proper names of a song, album, band or novel. They all use caps. Station1 (talk) 18:54, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
Yes but the idea is to have text on the page describing its primary meaning and maybe have links to "Going through the motions" from other references to the phrase in other Wikipedia articles.--Penbat (talk) 19:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
I think that would be fine, but you don't need to move this dab page to do that. Just overwrite the current redirect going through the motions with whatever you want (watch out for WP:DICTDEF), and put a hatnote on it pointing to this page. Station1 (talk) 19:10, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
No, please don't; this phrase is not encyclopedic enough for a standalone article. Powers T 15:23, 14 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. All entries on the dab page use caps. We don't need any description of the phrase on the dab page IMO, the Wiktionary link I added should suffice. PC78 (talk) 19:19, 12 October 2010 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.