Talk:Goat Rocks/GA1

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Anarchyte in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Anarchyte (talk · contribs) 12:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I'll start this review tomorrow. --Anarchyte 12:03, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, Anarchyte, I'll be around to respond to any questions or concerns. ceranthor 19:13, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Main review edit

Overall comments/Misc edit

Lead edit

  • Everything is fine here  

Geography and geology edit

  • The "Wood 1992" and "Hill 2009" references don't lead anywhere?
  • As some of the references are books, etc they don't have links.
  • Ref 12 doesn't lead anywhere. It's set to go to "#CITEREFCommission on Geosciences.2C Environment and Resources1994". Is this an error?
These should all be fixed. Thanks for the suggestions, they helped me realize I'd forgotten to include one of the sources I cited! ceranthor 18:30, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Eruptive history edit

  • Everything is fine here  

Wilderness edit

  • Everything is fine here  

Overall review edit

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:   (Pass)

All in all a very nice article which is accompanied by useful pictures. I'm gonna put it on hold for a bit just while the reference problems I mentioned earlier are dealt with. --Anarchyte 03:22, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

I have no problems passing this article for GA now. Congrats! Promoted to  . Anarchyte 00:47, 5 July 2015 (UTC)Reply