Talk:Global village (Internet)

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Community (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Community, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CommunityWikipedia:WikiProject CommunityTemplate:WikiProject CommunityCommunity articles

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

what are the diiferent ways that "glabal village" is used in the internet??

This article is horribly and sparsely sourced. --134.220.190.41 22:58, 3 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 05:45, 10 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

the claim that global village is always capitalized in the Gutenberg Galaxy is wrong edit

In my copy (1962) of the Gutenberg Galaxy, where "global village" appears twice p.31 the first time in the body of a text, the second time in the succeeding Chapter gloss, there is no capitalization. --Михал Орела 06:53, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Merging with Global Village (term) edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I agree, let's go ahead and merge them, but I think that this page should become a subsection of that page. mDuo13 (talk) 00:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic