Talk:Global Alliance for Preserving the History of WWII in Asia

Tag without Explanation

Hello. I happened to notice that a neutrality dispute tag has been placed on this article with a warning not to remove it. Yet there is no explanation of the reasons for the tag on the Talk page. I fact, even the Talk page has been removed. If there is a tag like this, shouldn't there be some explanation of the reasons for it? Gunnermanz (talk) 04:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

I've read this article and it is not neutral. The organization is not reporting history facts it is just demanding reparations, which have already been given multiple time. Leveni (talk) 09:53, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Global Alliance for Preserving the History of WWII in Asia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080418135127/http://home.netvigator.com/~hkra2002/ to http://home.netvigator.com/~hkra2002/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:22, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Multiple issues

Hi, I put the multiple issues template at the top. It has some pretty significant issues. It's clearly written as an advertisement, it lacks citations for most of the article, and uses bullet lists for what should be prose (especially the activities and demands sections). toobigtokale (talk) 06:19, 24 July 2023 (UTC)