Talk:Gilbert, Minnesota

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Moving of town

edit

I fact-tagged

The town of Gilbert was actually moved for the pit.

But maybe i should have done {{vague}} instead or as well:

  1. Were the town's legal boundaries changed?
  2. Were all, or most of the residents relocated?
  3. Were the homes of those relocated transported to new sites?
  4. If not, were demolitions of buildings compensated with unencumbered cash, with new houses built by the mine owners, or with money that could only be spent on new homes?

One would hope that the ref would make this clear, and if not, the ambiguity must be made explicit and explained.
--Jerzyt 19:19, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Gilbert, Minnesota. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:49, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply