Talk:Ghost Town (Kanye West song)/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: LOVI33 (talk · contribs) 18:16, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hey Kyle Peake, I'll begin my review now. It's a larger article so it might take me a little longer. LOVI33 18:17, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Infobox and lead edit

  • Not sure if psychedelic should be labelled as a genre since is refers to specifically the guitar and "sounds." LOVI33 20:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Background and development edit

  • First paragraph is really long, maybe split it into a few.

Composition and lyrics edit

  • "The track includes" → ""Ghost Town" includes"
  • "Guitar is included" → "A guitar is included" OR "Guitars are included"

Release and recording edit

Critical reception edit

  • Looks good.

Accolades edit

  • This could maybe be a subsection under 'Critical Reception' due it still having reviewers comments
  •   Not done since that is two paragraphs and a table, so is enough for its own section and the comments are from the lists only --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Commercial performance edit

  • "Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2" → "Freeee (Ghost Town, Pt. 2)"

Live performances edit

  • Looks good.

Appearances in media edit

  • Looks good.

Sequel edit

  • Looks good.

Credits and personnel edit

  • Change 'Credits' subsection to 'Personnel'
  •   Done but should I keep the credits adapted bit though? --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

Charts edit

  • Looks good.

Certifications edit

  • Looks good.

See also edit

  • Looks good.

Notes edit

  • Looks good.

References edit

  •   Not done since that is how his name is stylized --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

External links edit

  • Looks good.

Final comments and verdict edit

  •   On hold for now. This article is extremely well written, great job! The comments above I'm sure wont take too long. It's great reviewing your articles! LOVI33 20:12, 6 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • LOVI33 Have responded above, thanks a lot for the comments and I hope this becomes a GA soon. --Kyle Peake (talk) 07:23, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Great! Thats a  Pass! LOVI33 12:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)Reply