Talk:Gerber/Hart Library and Archives

Proposed deletion

Koavf, your proposed deletion was so fast (less than 2 minutes), it could make one assume that you have an extensive knowledge of libraries in general and gay-specific libraries in particular. Since "non-notable" invariably implies a degree of judgment, can you elaborate on your reasons for proposing the deletion? -- RayBirks 17:03, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

• Sure This article is not encyclopedic. If we have this, we might as well have First library with a magazine, Largest library on an island, List of people with two or less ears, etc. Why should we have an article on a library with 14,000 books? It took less than two minutes to read because there is virtually no content, and I find it doubtful there ever will be. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 18:26, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
  • The non-notable claim is invalid. Davodd 22:45, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Davodd, for those of us still learning, what criteri(on)(a) did you use to decide the non-notable indication was invalid? I considered removing the "prod" (proposed for deletion) marker on my own but had not yet gotten it together. Reading WP:Notability was only partially helpful. -- RayBirks 23:10, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
    • Okay. The claim about the non-notable claim is invalid. See how we get nowhere when you're flippant? -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 23:53, 8 August 2006 (UTC)
      • Koavf, again for us learners: Did you mean to use only 3 colons for indenting? Your reply seems to be to Davodd and not to myself, which suggests a different indent. (If you make a correction, please correct this comment to follow you.) -- RayBirks 00:23, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
        • Re: "Davodd" Yes, I was trying to respond to Davodd. That's why I don't like these semi-colons. Ugh. Feel free to re-format this edit however you see fit to make it intelligible and retain its meaning. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 00:55, 9 August 2006 (UTC)
      • I recommend reading User:Uncle G/On notability and User:Uncle G/Wikipedia triage. Uncle G 18:47, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

I apologize if my terseness was offensive. On second reading, I would have been offended if it was in response to something I did. User:Uncle G is correct. - Davodd 01:08, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Gerber/Hart Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071203140629/http://www.state.il.us/dhr/news_rel/GLBT_06.doc to http://www.state.il.us/dhr/news_rel/GLBT_06.doc
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070930030859/http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet91/sbgroups/sb/910SB0630LV.html to http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/legisnet91/sbgroups/sb/910SB0630LV.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060907083903/http://www.lib.niu.edu/ipo/1999/il9904228.html to http://www.lib.niu.edu./ipo/1999/il9904228.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:26, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Gerber/Hart Library. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151017032241/http://www.glhalloffame.org/index.pl?page=inductees&todo=year to http://www.glhalloffame.org/index.pl?page=inductees&todo=year

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)