Talk:General Airborne Transport XCG-16

The XCG-16 may have "won" the aerodynamic competition against the CG-13A (while it should have competed against the CG-10A, another of the large glider designs). However, the CG-13A had been flight tested and was put into in production well before July 31, 1944 while the XCG-16 had not been flight tested because the first XCG-16 was not delivered to CCAAF until August 1944. The XCG-16 could carry a relatively large weight payload, but the shape of the airfoil limited the size and shape of that payload. The XCG-16 could not carry a 1 1/2 Ton 6X6 truck as could the CG-13A. The most efficient, long range tow speed of both gliders was 135 m.p.h. Omitting theoretical speeds, according to Ordinance Department tow test charts, during full load tests, the XCG-16 was not towed above 153 m.p.h. and the CG-13A was not towed above 174 m.p.h. Thus, any speeds above those numbers are purely theoretical.

Also, Material Command is Materiel Command. --unsigned comment by User:Glidermanone 27 October 2007 (moved from article) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rlandmann (talk • contribs) 02:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm presuming you placed this here as unsourced and possibly original research/opinion? Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 04:22, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Re-write

I'm sorry that this re-write is not perfect, but it is a thousand percent better than the less than mediocre predecessor. I couldn't let that article stand as it was.Petebutt (talk) 19:31, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on General Airborne Transport XCG-16. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325233819/http://cmeunier.chez-alice.fr/TEOFG1.pdf to http://cmeunier.chez-alice.fr/TEOFG1.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:26, 26 January 2018 (UTC)