Talk:General-purpose technology
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on General purpose technology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070702160325/http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199290895 to http://www.oup.com/uk/catalogue/?ci=9780199290895
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Table capitalization
editThe large GPT table had a capitalization system I would call clipboard machismo—typography in the tradition of Brutalist architecture. Some people actually liked that architectural style, one must suppose, as it flourished for a time.
I've just now voted with my fingers on this article, but it's just one industrious vote, and it's finally for others to decide. — MaxEnt 01:49, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
Section redacted to lead
editFirst of all, there is not enough citation here, it all's a recap of a single book. The book mentioned dates to 2009 and has not a single review or rating on Goodreads. So, rather dated, and let's just say, not an epic tome liable to withstand the sands of time.
=== New general-purpose technologies in energy systems transformation ===
In the book Global Energy Transformation, author Mats Larsson refers to the work of Vernon W. Ruttan and argues that large scale government programs for energy systems transformation will become necessary to drive the development of new energy technologies. Energy efficient technologies and infrastructures will become necessary to drive economic growth in a future situation after peak oil. The task of developing and implementing these technologies on a large scale will be too complex and demanding in terms of resources, for the market to drive this on its own.
Larsson refers to earlier large scale development programs and projects, to support his argument. One is the transformation of US industry to war production during World War II, the second is the Marshall Plan and the third is the Apollo program. A similar government funded program will become necessary to transform global energy systems on a large scale.
Ruttan was also the main authority quoted in a section I left alone.
I don't think this was a bad addition to the article, but I think it needs at least a buff before returning to the limelight. — MaxEnt 02:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)
GPT, you say?
editWell there's a case of nominative determinism if I've ever seen one. flarn2006 [u t c] time: 03:08, 20 April 2023 (UTC)