This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Gender pension gap article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
A COMPANY would generally NOT be considered a Reliable Source WP:RS. Would an auto company be a RS for info on auto reliability or safety? For an individual company to be considered a Reliable Source, we use WP:USEBYOTHERS as the test, so if you can find research by a pensions company published in newspapers or other journalistic sources, that would lend credibility to that specific company's reports.---Avatar317(talk)23:02, 23 February 2022 (UTC)Reply