Talk:Ganoderma lucidum

Latest comment: 1 year ago by AltheaCase in topic Please clarify a complex word string

Untitled

edit

20 June 2020: I have included much more information about this species, including context about the confusion in its identification and sale that continues to today. I have additional work to do: cleaning up the reference list and adding links to the many other Ganoderma species listed in the article.

Previously, this page redirected to the article describing Ganoderma lingzhi, which is a different species now placed in a separate clade per genetic studies. I believe this redirection was in place because most people searching for G. lucidum were seeking additional information about the medicinal mushroom G. lingzhi (also known as reishi, lingzhi and ling chih, but these terms can apply to several Asian species of Ganoderma). However, on its face this redirection contributes to and reinforces the confusion caused by the mis-identification and mislabeling of species in the genus. It (erroneously) perpetuates the existence of a Ganoderma lucidum sensu lato that includes G. lingzhi and other species not in the same clade, one not supported by genetic evidence.

Because the mislabeling and marketplace confusion persists, I will modify the article to include the code for adding text/links at the top of the article to help people find information on reishi mushroom (G. lingzhi article, which also needs some major updates, based on recent published phylogenetic studies). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bearsbearsbears (talkcontribs) 20:46, 20 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

this article still seems pretty barebones & vague. It says it is found in Europe & parts of China. But no specifics about where. Where in Europe is it found? Europe is not a singular habitat let alone a singular country. Instead the article goes into specifics about which states in the US it is found despite saying it is most likely naturalised there.
Then the article keeps mentioning an entirely different species, including the Chinese and Japanese common names for that entirely different species yet we do not get the common names the fungi has in the places it is found in Europe. 159.196.12.148 (talk) 09:16, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Great article- what is a laccate

edit

Also in my opinion Some type of fungus is infesting the roots of a tree near the road that may be a result of pruning a tree in my opinion may have a function related to stretching the phloem of the trunk.Not sure what lucidum means also Berserkadvocacy (talk) 17:50, 16 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please clarify a complex word string

edit

Articles says, "Despite this recognition of additional species and subsequent discoveries of new Ganoderma species, such as 17 new North American species identified by Murrill North in 1902, the taxonomy of Ganoderma species has remained chaotic, and the species name Ganoderma lucidum continues to be used for most Ganoderma species, including commonly misidentifying Ganoderma sichuanense (= Ganoderma lingzhi) (also known as reishi mushroom (Japan) or lingzhi/ling chih (China)), the sought-after red Ganoderma species used in traditional Asian medicine." Is the following what the editor meant?

Despite this recognition of additional species and subsequent discoveries of new Ganoderma species, such as 17 new North American species identified by Murrill North in 1902, the taxonomy of Ganoderma species has remained chaotic. The species name Ganoderma lucidum continues to be used for most Ganoderma species, including Ganoderma sichuanense (= Ganoderma lingzhi; also known as reishi mushroom [Japan] or lingzhi/ling chih [China]), the sought-after red Ganoderma species used in traditional Asian medicine. Ganoderma sichuanense (aka Ganoderma lingzhi) is not Ganoderma lucidum, though G. sichuanesnse is commonly misindentified as G. lucidum.
BTW, the present perfect tense ("has remained") is problematic, in that a present tense is likely be a false statement very soon. When was this composed? Five years later who knows but that the taxonomists may get the taxonomy clarified and a general consensus may occur. Thus it is recommended that this statement be altered to read like this: "As of August, 2023, the taxonomy has remained chaotic for many years." Then at least 2 reliable sources are required to substantiate such a claim.(AltheaCase (talk) 17:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC))Reply