Talk:GPH Ispat

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 7 September 2019 by reviewer Gpkp (talk · contribs).

Bangladesh Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Environmental Issue Resolved edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The claimed environmental issue was resolved long ago by both parties. The environment department issued clearance for GPH Ispat project and here in this link you can verify this- http://ecc.doe.gov.bd/certificate_verification whereas the case no is- 67665. The full details can be found from the following link- https://www.thedailystar.net/frontpage/news/clarification-1736830

Since the issue got resolved, there is no point of keeping it as a whole separate segment.

Doesn't matter if it is resolved or not. There are reliable sources about these issues. If it is resolved, you can add it in the section with proper reference but not remove the whole section. We have to maintain NPOV, which is a policy of Wikipedia. Also, seems like you have a conflict of interest with this article. If so, please refrain from editing the article. - LogogB (talk) 14:16, 7 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic