Talk:Göyərcik
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Lennart97 in topic Requested move 12 June 2021
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
On 12 June 2021, it was proposed that this article be moved from Göyərcık to Göyərcik. The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 12 June 2021
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Lennart97 (talk) 07:44, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Göyərcık → Göyərcik – misspelling KHE'O (talk) 05:42, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Sam Sailor 16:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Several of these titles match the names in the GEOnet Names Server, and you have presented no evidence they are misspellings. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 07:12, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
- Having just checked Məzrə appears to be the GEOnet which is wrong and local newspapers correct. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
- Hereby I present my evidence: [1] Second of all, as a native speaker of Azerbaijani, I can assure that "Göyərcık" version of spelling does not align with the grammatical rules in Azerbaijani language. It is a clear typo. Thanks KHE'O (talk) 17:11, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
- Support seems to be the correct spelling from Azerbaijan sources. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:14, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Survey
edit- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
* '''Support'''
or* '''Oppose'''
,then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
References
editThe discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.