Talk:FTR (bus)

Untitled

I've started work on a major cleanup of this article, mainly involving removing large amounts of unsourced claims, and finding sources for the rest. If anyone knows of any sources that will be useful, either add them into the article or list them here. All help improving the article would be appriciated. --Jorvik 20:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

It may be a good idea to rename the "current" section, as even in just the year I've been in York, the bus times, payment methods, and payment amount has changed numerous times.144.32.57.111 (talk) 23:19, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Criticisms

Why was this heading renamed 'Developments'?

On their way out?

Given that they have been withdrawn altogether in York and withdrawn on evenings and Sundays in Leeds, and Firstbus has got rid of the www.goftr.com microsite does this indicate their days are numbered? (86.145.191.85 (talk) 23:33, 18 June 2012 (UTC))

It seems that they are going to be used on the Leeds to Bradford corridor[1][2][3] so maybe not just yet. :) Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:20, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

It seems that they have been withdrawn on weekends and evenings on Leeds-Bradford now. Is this the beginning of the end for them here? (86.169.65.130 (talk) 15:02, 4 June 2016 (UTC))

Well it seems they're still going on however judging by this, this and this there's been a lot of rumours flying around ..... Having not visited Bradford or Leeds in my entire life I would have no clue but I'd personally say judging by the comments etc it looks like they could be withdrawn by the end of the year but that's my 2¢. –Davey2010^Talk 16:12, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

It seems that the final day of operation of these buses on the Leeds - Bradford 72 route is Fri 22/07/2016. So it looks like the end of them in Leeds. Are they still operating anywhere else? (86.168.13.69 (talk) 19:14, 18 July 2016 (UTC))

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FTR (bus). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141021160947/http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/archive/2006/05/08/7982602.The_ftr_of_city_travel_arrives/?ref=arcThe_ftr_of_city_travel_arrives/ to http://www.yorkpress.co.uk/archive/2006/05/08/7982602.The_ftr_of_city_travel_arrives/?ref=arcThe_ftr_of_city_travel_arrives/
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.theyorker.co.uk/news/uninews/2099

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 28 December 2016 (UTC)