Talk:Frauds, Myths, and Mysteries
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Fracton in topic Changes and additions
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 March 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Please delete this
editThis article is purely promotional and has no real justification otherwise.
Please Do Not Delete
edit- How does a comment get here with no signature? The book is widely used in archaeology courses, that's enough to justify its inclusion.--Dougweller (talk) 19:00, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
This book is important as an internal link to verify archaeologic frauds. It should be kept. Pustelnik (talk) 12:13, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- I've now found out how to see who added a comment. The only other edit the person made who asked this to be deleted was to put a very rightwing POV on an article, so I'm assuming some such motivation was behind his/her request for deletion.Doug Weller (talk) 12:45, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
Changes and additions
editI'm planning to make some improvements to this article including:
- Add an infobox with cover image.
- Add a book synopsis, history, and reception
- Add book contents with brief descriptions of the chapters.
Suggestions welcome Fracton (talk) 19:38, 10 December 2022 (UTC)