Talk:Francis, Day & Hunter Ltd v Twentieth Century Fox Corp

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Law Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Canadian law.

Did Fred Gilbert die intestate? edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article cites the wording of the Judgment, i.e. that Gilbert died intestate. However, his entry in the Probate Calendar says that Probate was granted. I'm no expert on wills etc but I thought this meant that a will existed and had been duly executed. Without a will, there would instead have been an administration to deal with any assets. Can anyone clarify please? And what difference (if any) would this have made to the copyright issue, which appears to hinge on this issue of a will? — Preceding unsigned comment added by StylusGuru (talk • contribs) 12:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic