Talk:Flattening

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 65.92.244.151 in topic "Flattening"

Comments

edit

"centrifugal force" should be replaced by "centripetal force". centrifugal force does not exist.

-jskrzypek@gmail.com

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.215.155.167 (talkcontribs) 21:42, 18 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

It certainly does exist if you are in a rotating reference frame! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.129.0.125 (talk) 11:28, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Seconded! See http://xkcd.com/123/ :-) Seriously though, centrifugal force is indeed a 'fictitious force' in that it derives from a coordinate transform, but in a rotating reference frame it's a very useful concept. See the WP article on centrifugal force, in fact... Cooperised (talk) 17:14, 31 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Measuring oblateness

edit

I think that some discussion about the perturbation effects of planetary oblateness on natural satellites would be a good addition. My understanding is that Hermann Struve determined the oblateness of Mars based on the perturbation of the two satellites. Thanks.—RJH (talk) 22:06, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Major revision

edit

I have tidied up this page, simplifying some material, adding figures and removing all mention of angular eccentricity. (I have recently asked several professionals in the field about the angular eccentricity. All are agreed that this parameter is not used in the modern literature. The inclusion of this parameter as a central feature of so many wiki articles is a distortion of this subject area and as such it is contrary to wiki guidelines. See also comments here and here.  Peter Mercator (talk) 21:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Flattening ≠ Ellipticity

edit

The begining of this article states that ellipticity and oblateness are other terms used for flattening. I believe this suggest they are the same thing, which is wrong according to this site Felipebm (talk) 16:02, 2 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flattening. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

"Flattening"

edit

The topic for the pagename Flattening (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) was suggested to be changed to a different topic, see the discussion at talk:mode-k flattening -- 65.92.244.151 (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

65.92.244.151 (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2023 (UTC)Reply