This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In law school, I was up for Socratic questioning on this case. I still remember the facts. I think serving successfully as counsel at the Fed Circuit on a case that is in patent law case books (Westlaw) is significant enough to leave the article up. I also agree that this may be notable at least for its Chicago business history connection.
The founding section is weak and should have more citations. I would leave the self-published sources flag up but remove it from the Articles for deletion list. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.105.30.99 (talk) 03:06, 15 September 2007 (UTC)Reply
