Talk:Fire-Eaters
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Breckinridge edit
Breckinridge deleted from list of Fire-Eaters due to questions regarding the source/references to J.C. Breckinridge as a pro-slavery or pro-secession politician. Most historic resources list him as a Southern politician who worked to keep the North and South together. He was often linked to the Fire-Eaters because of they wanted him as a front-man based on his popularity and skill/charm as an orator. However, he wasn't a hawk like the Fire-Eaters... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Embonsi (talk • contribs) 03:19, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
Wouldn't Pro-Secession be more accurate than Pro-Slavery??
- If slavery didn't exist, there wouldn't have been any secession... --71.172.37.93 (talk) 00:41, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- An accurate definition of the fire-eaters would probably include both. If there had been no slavery, there would have been no Fire-Eaters.Ismaelbobo (talk) 19:06, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
This entry needs balance and citations. The Fire-Eaters were extremists, but they were reacting to perceived threats from abolitionists in the north, and this needs to be amplified. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismaelbobo (talk • contribs) 19:14, 14 November 2008 (UTC)
Reason for name? Why was this group dubbed 'Fire-eaters'? 74.70.106.13 (talk) 22:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
Edit: 1st March, 2016 edit
I edited the article to eliminate a few misleading remarks (Fire-eaters existed, and were referred to by that name prior to 1850, were not a movement restricted to politicians, etc.) - I recommend a total re-write by someone who has more than a cursory knowledge of Antebellum history, and, preferably, better writing skills and vocabulary than that presented herein.
Eli.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fire-Eaters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208030432/http://mshistory.k12.ms.us/index.php?s=extra&id=124 to http://mshistory.k12.ms.us/index.php?s=extra&id=124
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
Fire-esters should not be capitalized. edit
It's one thing to say they were Republicans or Baptists. But fire-eaters (no caps) were not a sect or a close group. There were no meetings where people ate fire. deisenbe (talk) 14:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)