This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Factual Accuracy
editI chose not to remove the material I questioned, however, I would like to see sources for the second section of the page. The disorganization of the page before I cleaned it up and created the Controversy section from one of the paragraphs leads me to believe that the claim is a false one. If no one responds to this post, I will assume the material stated was a fallacy and will remove it. Shadow 05:49, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
I made removed the section after months of waiting. Shadow 19:11, 14 October 2007 (UTC)