Talk:Ferguson v. JONAH

Latest comment: 1 year ago by 208.252.2.67 in topic Use of primary sources

Untitled

edit

Copyvio check passed High score is due to quotes from the decision. Legacypac (talk) 20:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Use of primary sources

edit

I removed a section primarily composed of primary sources. It is not our job to summarize court documents. If it is notable, there should be a secondary source, otherwise we should leave it out. See Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources for further information. FreePeoples (talk) 23:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lots of this article has the same prob. And is way over-detailed. 208.252.2.67 (talk) 01:51, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
And only has one perspective. 208.252.2.67 (talk) 01:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply