Talk:Ferguson v. JONAH

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

LGBT studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 22 April 2018 by reviewer Legacypac (talk · contribs).

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyvio check passed High score is due to quotes from the decision. Legacypac (talk) 20:49, 22 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

Use of primary sources edit

Latest comment: 6 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion

I removed a section primarily composed of primary sources. It is not our job to summarize court documents. If it is notable, there should be a secondary source, otherwise we should leave it out. See Wikipedia:Identifying and using primary sources for further information. FreePeoples (talk) 23:42, 9 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

Lots of this article has the same prob. And is way over-detailed. 208.252.2.67 (talk) 01:51, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

And only has one perspective. 208.252.2.67 (talk) 01:57, 7 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic