Talk:False Decretals

Latest comment: 18 years ago by FourthAve

See Talk:Pseudo-Isidore where planning for the merge is starting. --FourthAve 12:28, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Reply


This article on the False Decretals is somewhat outdated. The bibliography stops at the beginning of the 20th century. The Le Mans hypothesis is no longer tenable since Klaus Zechiel-Eckes has identified a number of manuscripts from the library of Corbie monastery which were undoubtedly used by the forgers. For a more or less up-to-date article on the subject see wikipedia s.v. Pseudo-Isidore. kgschon

Of course it is outdated - it is largely a copy from the Catholic Encyclopedia published in 1913. --Audiovideo 13:30, 2 Mar 2005 (UTC)


This article appears to be identical in its subject with the article on Pseudo-Isidorian forgeries and the article on Pseudo-Isidore while only the sources appear to be different. Why not merge all three articles into one? -tlatosmd, June 21st 2005, 9:20pm CET

Sounds good to me, but I'm generally a lumper. Shall we hold the discussion at Talk:Pseudo-Isidorian forgeries? --Wetman 20:51, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

See Talk:Pseudo-Isidore where planning for the merge is starting. --FourthAve 12:28, 11 November 2005 (UTC)Reply