Talk:Failed back syndrome

Latest comment: 2 years ago by 2600:1702:170:3B90:8C02:A7B1:AB2F:521B

Lack of Neutrality edit

This article repeatedly mentions throughout the article that job dissatisfaction, workers compensation, etc. is positively associated with Failed Back Syndrome. This could lead a casual reader to the mistaken belief that the majority of FBS sufferers are malingerers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1702:170:3B90:8C02:A7B1:AB2F:521B (talk) 03:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

note edit

A substantial number of back surgeries fail right from the start. Frequently back surgery results in creating some repetition of the same medical problem in the lower or upper spinal disc, requiring surgical attention.

Clearly there are situations where there is no other option but cutting the back, but reality shows only about 2% of all back pain patients may result in "must cut" category.

Acronym - FBS or FBSS edit

The article begins by using 'FBS' for 'Failed Back Syndrome' but later changes to 'FBSS' and uses that for the remainder of the article. There is no reason given for the change nor any indication of what the second 'S' might stand for.

Does 'FBSS' mean 'FBS Syndrome' where the 'S' in 'FBS' already stands for 'Syndrome'? Something similar is not unknown in other acronyms. For example, the commonly used 'PIN Number' when the 'N' in 'PIN' already stands for 'Number' - in full, 'Personal Identification Number Number', or ATM Machine, where the 'M' in 'ATM' stands for 'Machine' - in full 'Automatic Teller Machine Machine'.

Does anyone know the correct explanation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.51.186.96 (talk) 04:04, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Cost edit

Clearly back surgeries are not only very expensive and take long healing and recovery times which may also increase their costs by having to be laid up on recovery bed. Most back surgery bills can cost as low as $15,000.00 to $150,000.00 each depending on complexity and many other factors.

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Failed back syndrome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Failed back syndrome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:35, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply