Talk:Faboideae

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Kupirijo in topic Inverted repeat-lacking clade

synonym

edit

arthur Silva 08:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC) as stated in the Genera section: The genus Kennedya is a synonym of Kennedia, and is listed here as Kennedia.[2] I think the name shouldn't be considered as a synomym, its just an variated spelling. check the vienna code:32.7 (http://ibot.sav.sk/icbn/frameset/0036Ch4Sec2a032.htm#32.7.), may more rules there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arthursilva (talkcontribs) 08:32, 23 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

The cited source says "orth. var." and that's different from a synonym, yes (I won't bother to go double-check in the Vienna code). I've moved that sentence to Kennedia and rewritten it. Thanks for pointing this out and feel free to point out any mistakes I've made in wording. Kingdon (talk) 01:14, 28 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Systematics

edit

This section is preventing pdf file rendering. The schematic extends beyond the right margin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.65.123.35 (talk) 21:57, 19 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Faboideae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Faboideae. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:48, 27 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

What characters distinguish Faboideae?

edit

What characters distinguish Faboideae? philiptdotcom (talk) 00:40, 24 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Inverted repeat-lacking clade

edit

I am trying to link the article Inverted repeat-lacking clade to the IRLC link in the phylogenetic tree in the Systematics section. For some reason it does not work. Any ideas why is that? --kupirijo (talk) 16:49, 26 March 2020 (UTC)Reply