Talk:Europeans United for Democracy/Archive 1

Archive 1

POV check

The article as it stands seems to be rather keen on lionizing this movement. It could do with a more balanced hosing-down... perhaps once the congress gets underway there may be some media attention and critical commentary that might be worthy of inclusion. The Tom 03:14, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

The history of a new party is its platform. The description is based on the platform. The lionising aspect may lie in your perception. But you can comment on the personalities :)

btw, couldn't find the reply click, so i entered into the edit section.... i'm sure this is not the way. 27.02.2006 - bonici

(194.192.151.254 15:49, 2 March 2006 (UTC))I don't see why this test is biased. I checked their website - and the content here seems pretty much to be the same.

That's precisely the problem. Their homepage is naturally POV in their favour, and the Wikipedia article on them shouldn't be. —Nightstallion (?) 22:17, 2 March 2006 (UTC)

'Eurorealism'

I've removed the term 'eurorealism' because after some research using the FWSE, the only page which links the term to the EUDemocrats appears to be this wikipedia page. Obviously should someone find a reference linking to two it can be reinstated, although I personally would prefer to use terms which are more widely acknowledged. --Neil (talk) 10:52, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

We've seen the same "update" on :fr (reverted) - this is clearly not a neutral choice. Popo le Chien ^{throw a bone} 11:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC)

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 10:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Europeans United for Democracy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080302145232/http://indemgroup.eu/ to http://indemgroup.eu/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:22, 25 September 2017 (UTC)