Talk:European Parliament election, 2014/ Candidate list/ Christian Democratic Appeal

Requested move 24 August 2017 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: procedural close - consensus is to merge all articles into one, BasBr1 has indicated that they are willing to do this. DrStrauss talk 20:10, 30 August 2017 (UTC)Reply



– I think this is all of them. This is piggybacking off of a discussion in March, where it came to light that these 30 pages had an awkward naming scheme. From that, the general naming proposed is "[Party name] list for the [election article name], [year]". I want to ensure that there is some consensus for these moves before going ahead and moving them all. menaechmi (talk) 16:51, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Also, @Woody, Number 57, and BasBr1: pinging those in the original discussion. menaechmi (talk) 16:53, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
  • Support all although I'm not sure why many of them have no suggested title? It's surely just party name + "list for the European Parliament election, 2014"? Number 57 18:03, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
    • That's a good catch, I've updated it to make the page fill with red. If they had a stand-alone article, I used that name, otherwise it's just the translated title. Some (ikkiesvooreerlijk.eu and JEZUS LEEFT) I wasn't sure what the best option would be, so they're still blank. menaechmi (talk) 18:35, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
      • Whilst I support the moves, I wonder whether it would be better to simply merge them into Party lists in the European Parliament election, 20XX (Netherlands) (one article for each election) rather than having a separate list for each party? Number 57 18:58, 24 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
        • I created them all and will support the renaming if it's all of them. My preference is also to just merge into one page for every election, because some of them are only like 5 candidates and others have 50. BasBr1 (talk) 08:58, 25 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.