Talk:European Alliance for Freedom/Archive 1

Archive 1

Proposed merge with European Alliance for Freedom (European Parliament group)

The EAF has failed to reach the threshold needed to form a parliamentary group. There's no need to have to separate articles in this case. Don Cuan (talk) 12:48, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

• Support: Totally unnecessary to have a separate article on a proposed EP group that was never formed. It is sufficient to deal with this information in a short section in this article. --RJFF (talk) 17:40, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

A news article being more valid than the official website?

So I slightly edited two things on this page, namely the political positions of the party and used the original EAF website for that. But Autospark seems to favour using a news website as a source instead of the original EAF site. So I just want to ask some of you wiki editors out there: Do you think Autospark is correct on this matter? Like, Shouldn't the official site be used instead of a news article? --94.214.22.208

Bascially, WP:THIRDPARTY. Also, it's not good academic practice to categorise political parties/organisations based upon their self-identification and self-description. FWIW, I would prefer the article to include more academic sources, rather than news sources, if any relevant ones are available.--Autospark (talk) 23:27, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on European Alliance for Freedom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.eurallfree.org/?q=node%2F65
• Added archive https://archive.is/20140202104555/http://www.columnist.org.uk/?p=7072&preview=true to http://www.columnist.org.uk/?p=7072&preview=true

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:11, 24 September 2017 (UTC)